RICHARD LINKLATER’S FILMS: DREAMING ABOUT TIME AND REALITY
1990: Slacker.
1993: Dazed and
Confused.
1995: BeforeSunrise . .
1998: TheNewton Boys.
2001: Waking Life.
2001: Tape.
2003:School of Rock .
2004: Before Sunset.
2005: Bad News Bears.
2006: A Scanner Darkly.
1995: Before
1998: The
2001: Waking Life.
2001: Tape.
2003:
2004: Before Sunset.
2005: Bad News Bears.
2006: A Scanner Darkly.
2006: Fast Food Nation.
2008: Me and Orson Welles.
2008: Me and Orson Welles.
2011: Bernie.
2013: Before Midnight .
2014: Boyhood.
2016: Everybody Wants Some!
2017: Last Flag Flying.
2019: Where'd You Go, Bernadette.
2022: Apollo 10 1/2.
2023: Hit Man.
2024: Hometown Prison.
Rick Linklater is a fellow who likes to follow his own path, whether it leads him to the margins or into the mainstream. He’s hard to pin down. Various sources give his birthday as 1960 or ’61 or ’62, though all agree on
Though eschewing school, Linklater thrived in the intellectual ferment of the university town, and made it the subject of his first feature film, Slacker, a plotless succession of relentless talkers, dreamers, and nuts. The peripatetic philosophizing establishes one of the constants of his work, a celebration of idleness and ideation, clearing a space and a time to talk and to dream.
Nonetheless Linklater is no theorist, but a playful realist, focused on what he calls the “politics of everyday life.” His characters tend to talk big, but to live in the little details of their lives. His mission and method is simple: “What’s underrepresented in film is the real essence of life, the in-between space that gets glossed over.”
So he tends to be boldly speculative at the same time he is devoted to the earthy specificities of real life, which enables him to negotiate the divide between independent and commercial cinema, the handmade and the popularly accessible. Dazed and Confused has emerged as a classic teen stoner flick, but its real merit is in the precise depiction of the last day of high school in a
Though Linklater’s first mid-budget studio film, The Newton Boys -- a genial reversal of Bonnie and Clyde -- flopped, he clicked with the joyous School of Rock, and is back in theaters right now with a remake of Bad News Bears. Between his flop and his hit, he went back to basics and made two films originating on digital video that couldn’t have been more different. Tape is a three-character, one-room, real-time psychological chamber piece, while Waking Life is a sprawling, phantasmagoric exploration of dreaming, dazzlingly animated from a live-action original. (He returns to that technique in the Philip K. Dick adaptation, A Scanner Darkly.)
Linklater’s masterpiece so far, his incomparable paean to the intimate joy of talking, worthy of an Eric Rohmer, is the pair of films, Before Sunrise and Before Sunset. Both center around days in the life of two characters, embodied by Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy, first when they meet on a train in
As far as I’m concerned, Rick Linklater is the shining hope of American cinema today -- intellectual yet accessible, intimate yet socially conscious, personal yet popular, serious yet funny – in a phrase, artistic without being arty.
[The foregoing was written in 2005, as program notes for my film series "10 under 50: Top Directors Younger than the Clark," and updated in 2014 and again in 2024 with comments from this blog on subsequent Linklater films.]
Waking
Life is
a dream of a
movie about dreaming, artfully animated from live-action digital video,
painterly in kaleidoscopic ways. In a
mind-expanding meditation on “oneironaut” theories espoused by Austin TX
savants, the dream-within-dream structure flows and doubles back in intriguing
and funny ways. Smart, gorgeous, a compendium of Linklater themes and
characters -- what’s not to like?
True
to his vegetarian beliefs, Linklater adapted Fast Food Nation, Eric Schlosser’s muck-raking
book about industrial food production, by interweaving anecdotes and wisps of
story -- bringing together the putrid realities of meat processing, illegal
Mexican immigrants who work the slaughterhouse, and disaffected American
teenagers who sling the burgers, along with assorted others either caught up
in, or greasing, the food machine. Made fast on a low budget, the film has a
certain drabness, dramatically and visually, that is compensated by the cogent
points made by a succession of characters in striking cameos from the likes of
Ethan Hawke, Kris Kristofferson, Bruce Willis. In the end the human victims
stand aside for the bovine, in documentary footage that is as salutary as it is
gut-churning. While its stomach may be flopping, this film has its heart and
its brain in the right place, making many salient connections amongst the
various liabilities of the way we eat here and now.
Disappointed by Me and Orson Welles, a rare
slip from one of my favorites, I wasn’t expecting all that much from
Linklater’s latest, but Bernie turns out to be a damn fine
film, with a down home feel that makes it very personal. In his
genre-breaking style, Linklater mixes true crime with East Texas small town
comedy, just as he mixes actors with real townspeople in a Greek chorus of
gossip. Jack Black
is a revelation as a funeral home assistant with a serious people-pleasing
demeanor, good at corpse presentation, eulogies and hymns, and comforting
widows. He’s the most liked man in town, until he falls in with the most
unliked woman, a crotchety rich old widow played by Shirley MacLaine. This film
manages to be both funny and thought-provoking without bustin’ a gut over it.
Before
Midnight is the latest installment of
Richard Linklater’s ongoing masterwork -- the “Before” series, which
collectively could be titled à la Proust, “In Search of Lost Time.” Made in
close collaboration with Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy, as stars and co-writers,
the three films to date, made at nine-year intervals, are obsessed with the
passage of time, the interpenetration of past and future in the present, all
the modes of time travel. Each deals with one day in the life of a pair,
American writer and French social activist, as they reflect on the past and
imagine a future, as individuals and as a couple, trying to come to terms in and
with the present moment.
It
doesn’t hurt that while each film is inordinately focused on just two people
walking and talking, they do so in picturesque places – Vienna , Paris , and the Greek Islands . And the two
characters, whom we have watched age from their 20s to 30s to 40s, are
extraordinarily appealing, in all their complexity of confrontation and
evasion, showing the slippery side as well as the rough edges of each.
Permanence and mutability, connection and separation, fantasy and
disenchantment, all the vicissitudes of a relationship over time are explored
with wit and point.
Though
tightly scripted and rehearsed, and intimately intertwined with the characters’
prior incarnations, the endless back-and-forth seems spontaneous, even
improvised. And the three-headed creative process assures an even-handed,
fully-rounded treatment of both the boy and the girl, the woman and the
man. We come to know Jesse and Celine as they come to know each other,
for better and worse. They’re funny and sharp, and they each have their
reasons, and their unreasons. There’s no denying that sparks fly, but
will the fire burn itself out?
Linklater
contributes a deep sense of cinema history, setting the film in a great
tradition, explicitly alluding to Rossellini’s Voyage to Italy, but obviously indebted to Eric Rohmer’s
delicate tales of erotic negotiation, and Truffaut’s longitudinal study of
Jean-Pierre Léaud as Antoine Doinel over five films and twenty years, not to
mention Michael Apted’s monumental 7 Up series (now at 56 Up).
Boyhood has been so widely acclaimed that adding my own praise would be carrying coals to Newcastle . As a cinematic stunt -- filming intermittently over a dozen years to literally enact a child’s growing up -- it’s amazing, but even better for its substance. As much as this film seems to be life caught on the fly, in fact every line is scripted and rehearsed, repeating the process for as long as it takes to seem spontaneous. Its realism inheres in the practice of basing every scene on something that actually happened to Linklater or one of his actors or acquaintances. The film is naturalistic, but not improvised, and definitely not documentary. It’s a lived-in film, and a pleasure to live through. I doubt it will be supplanted as my choice for best of the year.
I’m a big fan of Richard Linklater and of baseball, so I expected more from Everybody Wants Some!!. It’s a pleasant autobiographical time capsule, as Rick relives his days as a Texas college ballplayer and captures many touchstones of growing up in the Eighties. Which, of course, are not my touchstones. The second exclamation point is certainly ironic, but this remains a bro-centric angle on the world. It all takes place on the first weekend of the school year, in a jocks’ residence that is definitely an “animal house.” Country, disco, metal, punk – as long as there’s music, and girls to chase, these guys are dressed for action and ready to go. Drunk or stoned, crazy or sane, they are athletes from ballfield to dancehall to bedroom. The cast is mostly unfamiliar but appealing, and decent ballplayers to boot. The film is affectionate, funny, and not as dumb as it seems, but still not up to the very high bar of Linklater’s previous work. [On a recent second viewing, I found more to like,
and missed less of what I like most about Rick.
This film pairs nicely with Dazed and Confused, taking his autobiography
from the last days of high school to the first days of college. It also marks the emergence of Glenn Powell, later to flower in Hit Man.]
Last Flag Flying is a film I single out as better than its general reputation. Many critics seemed to resent Richard Linklater’s decades-later “sequel” to Hal Ashby’s The Last Detail, but I never shared that reverence for the original. I would watch the Ashby again, if it were available, but it’s not really a prerequisite to the Linklater. In the gap between Vietnam and Iraq, Jack Nicholson has morphed into Bryan Cranston, as filthy motor-mouthed iconoclast, now a drunken bar owner. Laurence Fishburne has gone from hellraiser to preacher man, and Steve Carell is the gentle soul who served his time in the brig, only to lose his wife to cancer and his son to a Baghdad assassin. He gathers the Marine buddies he hasn’t seen for thirty years, to accompany him to his son’s burial at Arlington . Revelations lead to another road trip for the trio, as they re-forge their earlier comradeship. Linklater’s relaxed and thoughtful direction gives the actors plenty of space to work out their characters, mixing the comic and the tragic, while commenting on America ’s recent wars, those who serve and those who send them on fraudulent missions.
I gather that I had the perfect approach to Where’d You Go, Bernadette, not as an adaptation of a popular novel, but as the latest from one of my favorite directors, Richard Linklater. As such, and with a dynamite title performance from Cate Blanchett, good supporting roles, and excellent locations, I liked it much more than other critics suggested. Cate/Bernadette was a genius young architect in LA, and is now a sort of mad housewife in Seattle , where hubby Billy Crudup works at Microsoft, and she has a good but fraught relationship with the daughter she gave up her career for (Emma Nelson, in a promising debut). Unfamiliar with the novel, I had no problem with the film, and could just enjoy the way it begins and ends with spectacular footage of Antarctica .
Richard Linklater is probably my favorite director from the generation after mine (late as opposed to early Boomer). Apollo 10½ does not rank with his classics, but is a very pleasant memory piece about growing up in Houston in the late Sixties, given added dimension by the practice of rotoscoping, live action overlaid by animation, which Linklater debuted in Waking Life. While slightly fictionalized, the film has all the specificity of memoir, and is more a matter of time travel than space travel, digging into the culture of childhood in that time and place, in a nuclear family of six siblings, and a new-built neighborhood crawling with other children.
Hit
Man returns Linklater to Bernie
mode, in a true-ish crime comedy based on a Texas Monthly article, with
some hot romance added. Hot indeed in
the pairing of Glenn Powell and Adria Arjona.
He’s a mild-mannered psych/philosophy teacher, whose electronics hobby
leads to part-time police work with a surveillance team, which in turn leads
him to take on the role of a hit man in sting operations. She is one of his targets, clearly seeking
murder for hire, but also lovely and sympathetic. He lets her go with a bit of kind advice,
they meet again by chance, sparks fly, shit hits the fan. Linklater and Powell, who collaborated on the
script, are both Austin boys, but moved the setting to New Orleans to good and
witty effect. They definitely gave
Powell the chance to show off his acting chops as well as his abs, as he takes
on a different hit man persona for each potential client. Ms. Arjona also has ample opportunity to
shape-shift, and give off what I thought of as some Barbara Stanwyck energy. With so much to delight, I’m not inclined to
put forward my quibbles with the ending, which Linklater connects to the following film he was making at the same time.
“Hometown
Prison,” part of the documentary series God
Save Texas, inspired by Lawrence Wright's book of
the same name, is a feature-length meditation by Richard Linklater on how his hometown
of Huntsville (vide Dazed and Confused) came to be defined by multiple prisons
and a multitude of executions, delving into the liabilities of the
prison-industrial complex, the carceral state, and the ethics of the death
penalty.
No comments:
Post a Comment