Wallace & Gromit:
Vengeance Most Fowl (MC-83)
brought me back to Netflix for its day of release, and brought Nick Park and
Aardman Animation back to their glory days, with the return of the wacky
inventor and his canny canine companion.
Animation has moved largely to CGI over the past two decades, but
Aardman retains their handmade quality in malleable clay figures on
custom-built sets. The nonstop wit
remains, in tiny details and sweeping cinematic scenes, as well as the
endearing relation between the title characters. Wallace’s invention of a garden-gnome odd-job
robot threatens to come between them, until Gromit solves the problem, as he
usually does. A diamond-heist villain
returns to raise the stakes and provide wild action sequences. Love the canal boat
chase sequence! Perhaps this wouldn’t be
a bad intro to W&G, but I advise starting with their string of
Oscar-winning shorts from the 1990s.
Writer-director Nathan Silver
breaks out of the indie ghetto with Between the Temples (MC-83). I can imagine the elevator pitch, “It’s
A Serious Man meets Harold and Maude – picture
Jason Schwartzman and Carol Kane as the leads.”
And lead they do – to quite a funny and touching mélange of satire and
romance. He’s a cantor who lost his
voice when he lost his wife, in a fall on the ice of upstate NY. Living in his “moms’” basement, in
desperation he goes into a bar, has some unfamiliar drinks, gets into a
scuffle, and is rescued by an older woman in similarly desperate straits. She turns out to be his grade school music
teacher, and soon asks the cantor to prepare her for a long-denied bat mitzvah,
which becomes a redemptive bond between them.
Carol Kane is marvelous in the role, and Schwartzman inhabits the skin
of the schlubby cantor. Shot and edited
in a jagged style that can be hard to watch but ultimately conveys an effective
intimacy, this film includes a lot of good Jewish jokes, verbal and visual, and
a fair share of heartfulness.
I Used to Be Funny (MC-74) is
definitely the Rachel Sennott show, as she plays her character, a stand-up
comedian in Toronto, both before and after a traumatic event, which is arrived
at circuitously in the back-and-forth narrative. First-time writer-director Ally Pankiw honed
her chops on the excellent Mae Martin series Feel Good, and maintains
the balance of comedy and drama here, working in a number of contemporary
themes. A good and honest effort, this
film is watchable but not unmissable.
Cunk on Life (MC-75) offers more of the same after Cunk on Earth (reviewed
here). Not much to add other than I laughed a lot,
continuing to enjoy Diane Morgan’s portrayal of clueless tv presenter Philomena
Cunk, and the assorted British academics she pranks with ridiculous
questions. Not sure which to recommend –
Earth was a well-structured series of six half-hour episodes, Life is
a 71-minute potpourri of afterthoughts.
Best to watch both.
I wasn’t pre-sold on A
Man on the Inside (MC-75), but
recommendations from two couples who are fellow shoppers for a retirement
community, plus its inspiration by the celebrated Chilean documentary The
Mole Agent, were enough for me to give it a try. Which I never did to creator Mike Schur’s
previous series The Good Place or Brooklyn Ninety-Nine (though I
was very fond of his co-creation Parks & Recreation). So I was somewhat surprised by how much I
liked this gentle comedy-mystery about aging.
Ted Danson holds it all together as a retired engineering professor and
recent widower, who’s hired by a private investigator to go undercover into a
well-appointed San Francisco old-folks home to solve a series of thefts, and
incidentally to interact with a variety of staff and residents. While funny at times and moving at times, the
clincher here is truthfulness of characterization. The series doesn’t overstay its welcome in
eight roughly-half-hour episodes, but I’d have to be lured back for further seasons, which are already
teased.
With its 13 Oscar noms
outweighing my suspicion that it was not my sort of film, I took a look at Emilia
Perez (MC-71). And my conclusion was – that it’s not my sort
of film, but nonetheless has some redeeming qualities. Largely, the cast of women who collectively
won Best Actress at Cannes, and particularly Oscar nominees Zoe Saldana and Karla
Sofia Gascon. The latter plays a Mexican
drug lord who transitions into the eponymous female activist trying to ameliorate
some of the violence he was responsible for in the past. The former is a brilliant but
underappreciated lawyer who is recruited as consigliere. Jacques Audiard’s film is a wild mix of
genres -- musical, thriller, melodrama – which was enough to keep me watching,
but less than enthralled or convinced.
Saturday Night (MC-63) is a
hectically-paced 90-minute run-up to the debut of Saturday Night Live in
1975, a show destined to die a chaotic early death that has somehow endured for
50 years. I approached Jason Reitman’s
film with some skepticism but was won over by its fast-paced recreation of a
seminal moment in TV history. Most of
the central cast is unfamiliar (though Rachel Sennott is becoming better known),
but surprisingly reminiscent of the original characters. The currently familiar faces (e,g, Willem
Dafoe, J.K. Simmons, and Nicholas Braun) are all in hilarious cameos. Maybe you had to “be there” at the creation
to appreciate this fond and funny retelling, but it certainly got a marginal “thumb
up” from me.
With this month of Netflix, I
watched the second season of Top Boy (MC-86) from British TV in
2013. When I return for future months, I’ll
go on to the three subsequent seasons produced by Netflix. For now, all I’ll say is that this UK clone
of The Wire is not humiliated by the comparison, at least as far as the
drug dealing storyline goes. It will be
interesting to see if the remaining seasons broaden their focus, in the way
that The Wire did so memorably.
Netflix was once, back in DVD
days, the be-all and end-all of viewer choice, and then had a brief phase of
throwing money at all kinds of content providers, including genuine auteurs,
but now has settled into an algorithmic content-provider that does not rank
among the top three (or five?) streaming channels for quality. As of now, I’m cancelling until they give me
a solid reason to renew.
Speaking of once-substantial
streaming channels that have really given up on producing or offering
outstanding content, there’s Amazon Prime.
Hard to find much worth watching there (plus having to endure
commercials), but I was drawn to The Road Dance (MC-54) by its setting in the Outer
Hebrides a century ago, then put off by its low Metacritic rating. But casually browsing one time, I thought to
give it a try, and surprisingly watched the whole film. The location, already familiar from the
writings of Robert Macfarlane, was indeed appealing, as was the unfamiliar lead
actress, Hermione Corfield. Both were
pretty as a picture, and enough to keep me watching all the way through a
rather familiar melodrama of love, sex, childbirth, and war.
P.S. On the day my Netflix cancellation took
effect, I read a NYT rave about Asura (MC-89), a new Japanese series
on the channel. It had been out for
three weeks, and if I had known that it was directed by Hirokazu Kore-eda, a
particular favorite of mine, I would surely have watched immediately. Despite its vaunted algorithm, Netflix never
even showed me the title, in the endless scroll of its home page, let alone
recommend it to me based on my past viewing.
Critics already anointing the series as the best of 2025 may induce
Netflix to give the show more visibility, but its unceremonious dumping says
something about the economic imperatives of what the channel is pushing. Despite my ragging on Netflix, there is a ton
of worthwhile viewing there, if you dig for it amid what’s dumped on you. You need to know what to search for, and that’s
a service I aim to provide.
With a bargain annual
subscription, I don’t feel the need to pause the Criterion Channel during
months when I’m not that deep into watching their offerings, because I’ll
always have plenty to catch up on when I turn my attention that way. After a season when political, baseball, and
basketball races consumed so much of my viewing time, I returned to some
serious cinematic exploration.
We’ll start with some of
Criterion’s recent “Exclusive Premieres,” and then survey the monthly
collections that I have recently dipped into.
After his Oscar-winning
Drive My Car, I put Ryusuki Hamaguchi on my list of must-watch directors. First, I tracked down his earlier films Wheel of Fortune and Fantasy and Happy Hour. And now Criterion offers his latest
award-winner Evil Does Not Exist (MC-83). To tell the truth, I had some problems with
the beginning and the ending, but in-between I was as usual entranced by his
work. A long tracking shot upwards
through a forest canopy makes for a very extended credit sequence, and what
follows are protracted scenes of a solitary rural workman sawing wood and then
collecting water from a stream, which seem designed to school the viewer in
patience and attentiveness, but do pay off handsomely later in the film. It makes sense that this film started out as a
short to accompany a musical score by Eiko Ishibashi, then developed into a
feature. When dialogue actually starts,
it bursts out like an action movie, as locals debate the prospect of a new
glamping project that will impact the very nature of their community. With his usual evenhandedness, Hamaguchi turns
villains into sympathetic characters, with seeming heroes resorting to
highly-questionable behavior. Watching
this, be prepared to wait for the light but expect darkness to descend.
On the other hand, Catherine
Breillat is not a director who attracts my interest, but I was willing to give Last
Summer (MC-75) a try,
and I didn’t regret it, mainly for the lead performance of Léa Drucker. She plays a lawyer who deals in sex abuse
cases, but finds herself in an explicitly-illegal affair with her 17-year-old
stepson. This “Summer” is hot but more
dry than wet. We may wonder “what does
she think she’s doing?” but the actress somehow retains our sympathy despite
the filmmaker’s rather unpleasant intentions.
Is that ambivalent enough for you?
Here (MC-92) follows an ambling man at an ambling pace, but this
Bas Devos film certainly arrives at its chosen destination. It’s slow, but short and sweet – at first I
didn’t get it, but eventually I loved it.
He’s a Romanian workman on construction sites in Brussels, about to go
home for a vacation, uncertain whether he will return, clearing out his
refrigerator to make soup for a round of friends. She’s a Chinese academic working on a
doctoral thesis about mosses. They’re
both very reticent, but the connection is elemental, in the fugitive greenery
of a concrete jungle. The visual and
sound design are precise and evocative, the performers attractive and engaging,
the film a delicate but delicious concoction.
Bertrand Bonello’s The
Beast (MC-80) derives
from a Henry James novella, but in a mélange of genres that don’t generally
appeal to me, from sci-fi to stalker film, and the trailer suggests an outright
horror film. Nonetheless, Léa Seydoux
holds it all together and makes the extended runtime tolerable, as she and her
counterpart George MacKay meet and hesitantly woo in three different timeframes:
1910 Paris, 2014 California, and a 2044 dominated by AI. Surprised to see the film come in at #5 for
2024 in Film Comment’s critics poll, I was not immune to its appeal and its
inventive visual sense, but I’m not tempted to a second viewing to make more
sense of it. It was enough to spend 2½
hours in the seductive company of Ms. Seydoux.
It's been almost a decade
since I set foot in a movie theater, but if there’s one film I would have
preferred to see on a big screen, it’d be Songs of Earth (MC-85). I’d take my typical front-&-center seat and
just immerse myself in its sights and sounds.
Margreth Olin invites us to spend a year in the company of her elderly parents
amidst the remote farming village where her family has lived for hundreds of
years, set among the glacial glories of a Norwegian fjord. And she rewards us with a sublime evocation
of a transcendental landscape, literally following the footsteps of her
84-year-old father to wondrous sights, macro and micro, animal and mineral, especially
with exquisite drone footage, through a cycle of seasons beautifully
orchestrated by natural and musical sounds.
The father’s wisdom and the parents’ enduring relationship, embedded in
a long history of place and people, rounds off this superlative film. It’s a delightful cinematic treat for any
viewer in a contemplative state of mind, an armchair journey to the ruggedly
beautiful top of the world. This is the
sort of offering that makes the Criterion Channel indispensable.
Chicken for Linda! (MC-84) is a French
animated film about a mother and child trying to recall the dead husband and father
by making his favorite dish, chicken with peppers. This being France, they are thwarted by a
general strike that means no chicken is available, which leads to a caper and a
police chase, among other raucous goings-on.
The slight premise is enlivened by simple hand-drawn animation in a busy
Fauvist color scheme, along with musical numbers. The look is highly distinctive, the story
somewhat scattered, but nonetheless funny and touching.
Though Iran has largely
suppressed its internationally-acclaimed filmmakers, a new voice emerges with Terrestrial
Verses (MC-83) by a directorial
pair who compiled this clever satirical amalgam of nine minimalist vignettes
that illuminate the constraints imposed by the fundamentalist regime. The effect is both maddening and hilarious,
as some unseen functionary confronts a hapless petitioner with a roundabout
rationale for why their request cannot be granted, whether it be naming a child
or obtaining a driver’s license or getting a job or retrieving a dog. We are put in the position of the unseen,
unsympathetic official staring balefully at a citizen trying to understand the ever-shifting
rules of the game. Nobody gets beaten
with a truncheon, but everybody gets beaten down, in an outrageous manner that
is often laugh-out-loud funny.
The only streaming channel
that comes anywhere close to having as many exclusive premieres of off-beat
excellence as Criterion is MUBI, but the latter is worth only the occasional
month’s subscription, while Criterion has enough depth and variety with its back
catalogue and monthly collections to warrant an ongoing annual subscription. Watch for a month’s worth of MUBI coming up.
Having fallen for Fallen Leaves,
I’ve been on the lookout for earlier films by Aki Kaurismäki, and Criterion
offered The Other Side of Hope (MC-84). By now I’m familiar with his minimalist
deadpan style, and receptive to the heart and humor that underlies it, which
leads to “humane” as the epithet most commonly applied to the director. This film tracks a Syrian refugee who arrives
in Helsinki as a stowaway, and also follows a haberdashery salesman, who leaves
his job and his wife to take over a sketchy restaurant. The two stories eventually interweave, with
interludes of Finnish street musicians between scenes. Stylized the film may be, but it’s also an
honest exploration of issues of immigration and reaction.
Turning to recent
month-by-month collections on Criterion, I gravitated to “Lionel Rogosin’s Dangerous Docufictions,” but I think you’d need to have my lifelong interest
in documentaries and predilection for neorealism to join me in seeking out the 1956
classic On the Bowery (Wiki). In the
tradition of Robert Flaherty, Rogosin does stage scenes with non-actors, but
the film is a fascinating time capsule of NYC, redolent of the boozy breath of
the Bowery’s denizens, in a portrayal of the desperate sorrows and fleeting
joys of an outcast life. Black
Roots (Wiki) is an
intriguing time capsule from 1970, a perspective on Black culture at the time,
with street portraiture of Black faces, intercut with conversations among a
group of Black activists and musicians.
That was so resonant an example of politically-engaged, no-budget
filmmaking that I glanced at several more Rogosin films, but did not stick with
any of them.
“Hitchcock for the Holidays” collected 19 of the maestro’s films, a great chance
to take in a number of classics. The one
I was most eager to see again was Shadow of a Doubt (Wiki), highlighted
by the performances of Theresa Wright and Joseph Cotton as “Charlie” and “Uncle
Charlie,” the small-town niece gradually turning from adoration to suspicion of
her worldly namesake. With a minimum of
violence, this humorous suspense film holds up with Hitchcock’s best, whom I’ve
always admired as an artisan and entertainer, but rarely felt an affinity for
as an artist. Not sure how long this
collection will linger on Criterion, but it’s a great opportunity to sample all
the phases of Hitchcock’s career.
Similarly, in the “Pre-Code Columbia” collection, the one I wanted to see again was the standout 1932 film Forbidden
(Wiki), directed
by Frank Capra and starring Barbara Stanwyck.
Perhaps I was not quite as enamored of this as when in the throes of
putting together my career summary of Stanwyck, but it’s still worth recommending. She’s excellent as usual, and Adolphe Menjou
very good as the ambitious politician with whom she has a lifelong secret
relationship, but Ralph Bellamy is an irritant as the newspaper editor who
makes trouble for them.
In an Ida Lupino collection I caught up with The Hard Way (Wiki) in
which she plays a hard woman who rises from hardscrabble roots by ruthlessly
stage managing the career of her talented younger sister (Joan Leslie), and
lifts this film above the usual run of show biz backstories (this one supposedly
based on Ginger Rogers’ bio). Lupino
referred to herself the “the poor man’s Bette Davis,” and Davis reportedly
regretted passing up this role after she saw Lupino’s performance. That was from 1943, but I watched three more
of her films, all from 1941, and each confirms her actor-father’s judgment that
she was “born to be bad,” a characterization she managed to escape by becoming
a director herself. In High Sierra
(Wiki),
opposite Humphrey Bogart, and The Sea Wolf (Wiki),
opposite John Garfield, she plays thinly-veiled prostitutes on the run. Returning to her British roots in Ladies
in Retirement (Wiki), she’s
a Victorian ladies companion, who turns to murder in desperation to keep her
two “peculiar” sisters out of an institution.
All are watchable if you get pleasure from old Hollywood studio movies,
but none is an unmissable classic.
I’ve always been averse to a
simpering quality in the sisters Joan Fontaine and Olivia de Haviland, but each
of them did some good work outside of their routine performances, probably
having to do with the quality of director they were working with. Fontaine shows some surprising wit in Frenchman’s
Creek (Wiki),
Mitchell Leisen’s adaptation of a Daphne du Maurier novel. This Restoration-era costume drama set in
Cornwall is shot in eye-popping Technicolor and was in 1944 the most expensive
film Paramount had ever made. It’s sort
of bodice-ripper in which no bodices are ripped, as Lady Dona’s romance with a
French pirate seems rather chaste. It’s
all quite lush and absurd, a fitfully-amusing piece of wartime escapist
entertainment.
Film history is my history, in
more than one sense, and among the pleasures of seeing or re-seeing American movies
from my younger years is being reminded of -or introduced to - the culture of
the period. But the main draw for Angel
Face (Wiki), an
Otto Preminger film noir from 1953, was Jean Simmons as the eponymous femme
fatale. Robert Mitchum is aloof and
impassive, too tough to be taken in, but still caught in her web of intrigue. Leon Ames steals the show as a fancy lawyer
who knows how to play the jury for a not-guilty verdict. This film has an amusing backstory as Howard
Hughes’ revenge on Simmons for cutting off her hair to spite him – check out
the stiff wigs she was made to wear all the way through.
One appeal of the Criterion Channel
derives from its genetic connection with TCM, which provides retrospective
window into 20th century English-language film, and by now even those
of the 90s are “oldies.” Here are a
couple of former favorites I was happy to revisit, both by directors who were
among “10<50,” my film series at the Clark on its 50th
anniversary, celebrating the best directors under fifty.
Alexander Payne first broke
through with Election (MC-83), which deserves
inclusion on any list of the best films about politics, albeit about a student
government contest in Omaha, Nebraska. Reece
Witherspoon was great as a go-getting high schooler, and startlingly young in
retrospect. Matthew Broderick was also
first-rate as the teacher she bedevils.
The film holds up for hilarious satire, but seems even more incisive
about the nature of our politics. And
Payne continues to make good films, up through The Holdovers so far.
Cameron Crowe followed up Say
Anything with the equally-endearing Singles (MC-71), before hitting an early peak with Jerry Maguire and
Almost Famous, whose success he has not come close to matching since. Singles follows a group of Seattle twentysomethings
in the early grunge era, and boasts winning performances from Campbell Scott,
Bridget Fonda, Matt Dillon, and Kyra Sedgwick.
Crowe’s period rom-com has a notable authenticity when compared to
something like Reality Bites, where Ben Stiller wastes the likes of
Winona Ryder and Ethan Hawke.
Speaking of Hawke, another
90s film that seemed worth another look was Gattaca (MC-64), one of the rare sci-fi films that I remember
liking. And it’s certainly the pairing
of Hawke with Uma Thurman - whom he would soon marry - that gives the film
luster. Along with Jude Law, some
notable cameos, and the overall theme of genetic engineering. Not sure Andrew Nicoll’s film held up on
second look, but it’s certainly worth a first.
Going back to earlier
collections, I watched some films that may have rotated off the channel by now. Having found surprising depth in Linda
Darnell, I thought to give another unfamiliar Forties star a chance. I’m afraid I still can’t see the appeal of
Gene Tierney, but I found Leave Her to Heaven (Wiki) quite
interesting nonetheless. Shading noir
into Sirkian Technicolor melodrama, it offers lavishly photographed vacation
spots in New Mexico, Georgia, and Maine, with Tierney insanely (indeed
murderously) jealous of husband Cornel Wilde (hard to imagine all round). One of the most popular films of the
immediate post-WWII era, this is a (sometimes inadvertently) entertaining
cultural time capsule.
The continuing relevance of
the Scopes trial was highlighted in reviews of Brenda Wineapple’s recent book
about it, Keeping the Faith. So
when Criterion’s collection of “Courtroom Dramas” included Inherit the
Wind (Wiki), I
gave it another look. Written as a
parable of McCarthyism in the 1950s, this play was filmed by Stanley Kramer,
famous at the time for his middlebrow liberalism, and stars Spencer Tracy as
Clarence Darrow’s stand-in, Fredric March as William Jennings Bryan’s, and a
nondancing Gene Kelly as the acerbic journalist H.L. Mencken’s. They’re all quite good, and the dramatized issues
of militant fundamentalism seem up to the minute, even though the trial
happened a century ago.
In the same collection, I was
attracted by the cast of Runaway Jury (MC-61) even though it was
directed by a guy I never heard of, and based on an author I’ve never deigned
to read, even while selling lots of his books back in the day – John Grisham. But John Cusack, Rachel Weisz, Gene Hackman,
Dustin Hoffman? – sounds like a must-see.
Unfortunately, no. That group can
keep you watching, but nothing else about the film seems at all plausible. And given the continuing relevance of mass
shootings, this legal drama about the culpability of gun manufacturers is tissue-thin.
That may be a downbeat end to
a celebratory survey, but you can bet I’ll be back with further explorations of
Criterion. I’ll break off here and return soon with surveys of new releases
on Kanopy and on Netflix, with Mubi on the horizon.
I think it’s fair to refer to
AppleTV+ as the new HBO, not having the most product in the pipeline, but
what’s there is “cherce” (cf. Kate Hepburn in Pat and Mike). My previous round-ups are here
and here. Some of their headliners do not appeal to me,
but we’ll start with new seasons of three series I really like.
Sharon Horgan, as writer and
lead actress, has been a must-watch for me since Catastrophe, so I was
eager to see Bad Sisters (MC-76) come back for an unexpected second season (first reviewed
here). It did not disappoint, but I’m glad that
Horgan considers the Garvey sisters’ story now complete. The five of them were a delight from start to
finish, but it’s good to know when a series has reached its limit. Seasons one and two echo back and forth
nicely, but another death for the sisters to confront collectively would have
to be a manufactured mystery, and not the organic development of these two. Season two returns most characters and adds
several well-portrayed new ones. The
brilliance of the characterizations and comedy remain, as well as the
attractive Irish setting. I would draw a
strong contrast between this and an anemic comic mystery series like Only
Murders in the Building.
I was also eager for an
unexpected second season of Pachinko (MC-87). I liked the first season so much that I read the book, and wondered how they would come back
for more. And the series returns
impressively, if not quite the revelation of the first go-round. This saga about a Korean family living in
Japan continues to span generations, following the matriarch from youth to old
age in rapid time shifts. The second
season’s time frames switch between WWII and the end of the Japanese boom years
in the 1980s. There’s a new dance &
music opening title sequence in a Pachinko parlor that rivals the Emmy-winner
of the first season, and almost all the characters recur. I renew my strong recommendation for this
outstanding series.
The fourth season of Slow
Horses (MC-82) was
fully expected, but fully satisfying nonetheless. These adaptations of Mick Herron’s Slough
House spy novels are at the apex of franchise entertainment. Stylish and kinetic, well-acted and
well-shot, with welcome characters and attractive English settings (mainly
London), these MI5 thrillers stand well above the typical run of British
mystery series. Count on many foot chase
scenes and a final shootout, but also count on canny characterizations and a
continuous current of humor. Gary
Oldman, Jack Lowden, and Kristin Scott Thomas remain to lead a stellar cast
through its familiar yet still intriguing paces amidst the underbelly of
spycraft. Now we can expect more of such
pleasures from two further seasons already in the works.
Alfonso Cuarón has made some
great films, so I forgive him for Disclaimer (MC-70). I wouldn’t
mind if he had consumed a couple hours of my life for this potboiler, but 350
minutes over 7 episodes? Give me a
break. I want at least half that time
back. He suckered me in with Cate
Blanchett and Kevin Kline, teased me with Lesley Manville and a totally new
look for “Borat.” Then served up a total
turd of a climax, which only made me recollect the mendacities of the preceding
episodes. A sad comedown for the creator
of Y Tu Mamá También (the memory of which is cheapened by this takeoff)
and Roma (a masterpiece of personal authenticity that shames this sham
of a story), and many other worthy films in-between. A lot of talent gets wasted here, and it’s
sad that this is the sort of teleplay that can get financed these days, with
resources that could have produced three deeper and more truthful films.
Apple also offers some feature
films of interest. With Fancy
Dance (MC-77),
I came for Lily Gladstone but came away impressed with Native American writer-director
Erica Tremblay’s feature debut, after she had worked on some episodes of Reservation
Dogs. The film addresses several topical
concerns, such as the disappearance of indigenous women. Gladstone is the sister of one such, trying
to search for her, while taking care of the 13-year-old niece endearingly played
by Isabel Delroy-Olson, whose great hope is to be reunited with her mother for the
grand Pow Wow that gives the film its name.
Gladstone resorts to some petty crime and enlists her niece in various
cons to get by, until the authorities displace the child into the custody of a distant
white grandfather. The aunt abducts her in
turn for a fraught road trip back to the Pow Wow. The finale is gratifying in its own way, but
hardly resolves all the issues raised by this promising film.
From the Oscar-winning 12
Years a Slave to the even-better Small Axe series of films,
Steve McQueen has made some great cinema, but Blitz (MC-71) does not fall into
that category. There are some bravura visuals
(which despite widescreen color and CGI effects have nothing on the great
Humphrey Jennings documentary Fires Were Started), but the story is
conventional, almost folkloric and sometimes decidedly Dickensian, about a
child undergoing trials as he tries to make his way back to his mother. She’s played by Saoirse Ronan, which is a
plus, but the biracial boy did not impress me as he did some commentators,
though he did give McQueen the opening to show some cracks in the myth of
British solidarity under attack. There
are other good performances, but nothing to raise the film out of the ordinary,
which is a disappointment from a director of this stature.
On a night when I didn’t want
to strain my brain, I was happy to be entertained by George Clooney and Brad Pitt
in the “cleaner” comedy Wolfs (MC-60), as each lone wolf is
called into a messy matter that may harm Amy Ryan’s election as D.A. and they
are compelled to work together while repelled by their very similarities. The rapport of the leads is well-honed and it’s
enjoyable to spend time in their company.
Nothing consequential, this is a lightweight entertainment that might
hit the spot on a given night, if you haven’t already OD’ed on buddy comedies
or this particular pair.
If you’re into nature documentaries,
Apple has a notable new entry, The Secret Lives of Animals (MC-tbd)
in ten half-hour episodes, true to the BBC brand but with Hugh Bonneville doing
his best David Attenborough imitation.
With lots of time left on my
Apple free trial, I will no doubt have some postscript to this round-up. But for now, I conclude my survey with Bread
and Roses (MC-79),
a film about Afghan women mounting resistance after the Taliban returned to
power. It’s mainly composed of cellphone
video by the women themselves, so the film has immediacy, but little shape or
coherence. What comes across is how strange
a place Afghanistan is, and how dire is the plight of women returned to a fundamentalist
rule that deprives them of education, work, and even basic freedom of movement.
A second season of Colin
from Accounts (MC-85) was
enough to make a brief special offer from Paramount+Showtime seem worthwhile. If, like me, you are a confirmed devotee of Catastrophe,
then you owe it to yourself to seek out this Australian odd-couple comedy,
created by and starring real-life couple Patrick Brammall and Harriet Dyer. He is the 40ish proprietor of a Sydney
brewpub, she is a 30ish medical intern.
Colin is the dog who brings them together and keeps them together. Their coworkers and families fill out the
roster of kooks who populate the show, as it oscillates between cringe comedy
and authentic relationship drama, doing justice to both and remaining both
wildly funny and fondly truthful.
Looking around for anything
else to watch on P+, all I could recommend are some already-seen shows such as Couples
Therapy and Freaks & Geeks.
But I was enthusiastic enough about the final season of the HBO series Somebody
Somewhere that I was eager to see more of Bridget Everett, and P+ had her
Comedy Channel cabaret act Gynecological Wonder (IMDb), which
is infinitely raunchier, and hilariously shocking in its exuberant
naughtiness. Wondering whether the understated
portrayal of the series or the raucously uninhibited comedy act was closer to
her real personality, I watched some YouTube interviews that confirmed my
impression that her routine was inspired by Bette Midler, as a consciously
self-freeing effort to bring out a different side of her personality. This may be too over-the-top for many, but I
heartily recommend Somebody Somewhere for everybody.
In
fairness P+ has added a lot of very good movies lately, but none I hadn’t seen. They did have one offbeat film I couldn’t
find elsewhere: The Eternal Memory
(MC-85) is
the second Oscar-nominated documentary from Chilean filmmaker Maite Alberdi (The
Mole Agent, recently fictionalized into the Netflix series Man on the Inside). This one follows the struggle (and reward) of
a long-time relationship, as one of the partners is gradually succumbing to
Alzheimer’s. He was an undercover
journalist during the Pinochet regime and spent much of his subsequent career
trying to prevent those years of dictatorship being memory-holed. His second, younger wife is an actress who
became culture minister in a later democratic administration, and now she
tenderly cares for him as his mind slips away, in a medical drama that is also
a love story and a political metaphor.