Steve Satullo talks about films, video, and media worth talking about. (Use search box at upper left to find films, directors, or performers.)
Thursday, December 24, 2020
Oscar bait
Monday, December 21, 2020
Taking a small axe to a big tree
Amazonia
Sunday, December 06, 2020
It's a not-so-wonderful life
By the happenstance of
streaming release, I saw a strange double-feature on a recent evening, and I
replicate the experience with this nonsensical pairing. First up was the Hulu original, Happiest
Season (MC-68). Now, I am no
more drawn to the fantasy of holiday family reunions than I am to the reality
of them. So-called would-be “Christmas
classics” are not a party I want to attend or a genre I want to watch, but when
the couple going home for the holidays is Kristen Stewart and Mackenzie Davis,
maybe I’ll have a look-in. In the event,
they bring way too much emotional firepower to this piece of fluff, which
descends into slapstick, also wasting Alison Brie and
On the other hand, if Ken Loach’s Sorry We Missed You (MC-82, Kanopy) had been anything more, I’d have been pole-axed. That’s no surprise, since Loach ranks high in my pantheon of directors, and never strays from troubling topics, this time the impact of the gig economy on gig workers, specifically a Newcastle family where the mother works as an on-call home health aide (or “carer,” as she refers to herself) without contract, benefits, or set schedule. The father can’t find suitable work in the construction industry anymore, so becomes a franchisee in a package delivery company, where he has to buy his own van and does not get any wages but just a per-package fee for each he delivers, subject to penalties and chargebacks. Their teen son is bright and artistic, but sees the economic dead end he faces, so acts out through graffiti and other gestures of rebellion. The cute and also bright preteen daughter acts out the family stress by bedwetting. It’s all pretty grim, but as usual with Loach the nonprofessional acting is remarkable, and the film’s social and moral argument delivered cogently and forcefully. Painful to watch, the film reeks of reality and relatability, with the reward of deeper understanding of how the other half lives.
I’ve already written here
about Loach’s career, but I am adapting and adding to that summary, to post
with my other “career summaries” (in column to right, if you’re on a computer
rather than a phone). More and more, I
think, those will become the focus of this blog.
Miscellanea
And here’s an addendum to
“Docs advice”: You don’t have to be a
longtime bookseller to appreciate D.W. Young’s documentary The
Booksellers (MC-72, AMZ), but it certainly helps. Antiquarian booksellers are a different breed
from us humble retailers, but I can certainly appreciate their bibliophilia,
collecting passion, and general oddity.
This film is well put together, and continuously entertaining in its
low-key manner. If you have a thing for
books, or for collecting, or for odd sorts of people, then you will enjoy this
movie.
One last film, entirely sui generis, falls under this heading, which I can’t recommend for the faint-hearted but also can’t ignore. Beanpole (MC-84, Kanopy), which won an award at
Monday, November 30, 2020
British family affairs
The Crown (MC-85, NFX) in its fourth season remains an
intoxicating mix of history, spectacle, and soap opera. Though I watched with a subscriber to Majesty
magazine – which circulates among her sisters and nieces – and had her at
hand for character ID and fact-checking, I did not go into this series with any
great antecedent interest in the Windsors et al. And that despite the fact one of the
earliest Christmas presents I can remember receiving was a replica of
As a longtime fan of Nick
Hornby, I came in a roundabout way to a week’s free trial of Sundance Now, in
order to watch State of the Union (MC-81). In an interview, he mentioned taking
inspiration from High Maintenance to break out of the half-hour or hour-long
tv box, and deciding to do a series of
In the interests of self-understanding, I look for films, documentaries, or shows that highlight the issues of autism, so when the recent third season of The A Word (MC-76, AMZ) generated comment, I was drawn into the first season, from 2016. Like In Treatment, this is an outstanding adaptation of an Israeli tv series that takes serious interest in human psychology. Set in the picturesque English Lake District, it’s an hour-long family drama, with excellent writing and acting all round, and a strong streak of humor in the behavior of an extended dysfunctional family. Almost all the actors and creators were new to me, so I won’t bother to list names, except to affirm that the ensemble is impeccable. I’ll have more to say after I watch seasons 2 and 3 (six episodes each), but I want to enter an early recommendation on the record. I’m not sure how they drew out the performance of the 5-year-old autistic boy, but it is remarkably convincing. His parents are initially deep in denial about his condition, and about the whole family’s communication problems. There’s a clueless, recently widowed grandfather; a sweet and sympathetic teenage sister; and an aunt and uncle who’ve moved in next door with their own set of marital and career difficulties. The family business is a brewery, and the son-in-law is branching out into a rustic gastropub. The landscape and the village characters round out the appeal of this series, but for me truthfulness was the defining characteristic, sometimes unflattering but always compassionate and perceptive. Will have more to say when I get through further seasons.
Sunday, November 29, 2020
Show-me-time
Showtime has never made sense to me as a premium channel worth subscribing to (their only series that I followed all the way to the end was Nurse Jackie), but I do make note of films or series that seem worth watching, in order to take advantage of a month’s subscription (or free trial) when the channel presents something I really want to see – in this case, Ethan Hawke as John Brown in The Good Lord Bird, whose release had been delayed several times. So here are a few hangovers from 2019 films that I wasn’t able to see elsewhere, and a few other shows I watched while I had the chance.
Hustlers (MC-79) is a based-on-fact caper film about high-end NYC strippers, made by and to some extent for women. Written and directed by Lorene Scafaria, and featuring a powerhouse performance by Jennifer Lopez, it begins just before the financial meltdown of 2008, when the strippers are making a decent living catering to the whims of money managers. After the fall, the wolves of Wall Street get shorn by sheep, as the women develop a scheme to fleece the predators in turn. The film moves fast, but doesn’t go anyplace in particular, making gestures toward sisterhood is powerful, and motherhood as madness, but coming down firmly in the realm of shopping equals bliss.
Since GLOW I’ve taken
an interest in Marc Maron, which is cemented by Sword of Trust (MC-70),
where he plays an Alabama pawn shop owner who comes into possession of an old
sword with accompanying “documentation” that “proves” that the South won the
Civil War. As such, it is considered
highly collectable by a certain sort, and with his spacey assistant and the
lesbian couple who brought him the sword, they fall into a rabbit hole of
unreconstructed Confederate white supremacists.
Written and directed by Lynn Shelton, the film is offbeat, deadpan,
improvisational, and absurd, but also quite moving at times, not least in an intimate
scene between Maron and
Reviewing
Painter Julian Schnabel may
be arty and self-indulgent as a director, but he has made a number of high-quality
films, and At Eternity’s Gate (MC-76) is another. There have been many biopics about Van Gogh,
but this is a worthy and novel addition, distinguished above all by Willem
Dafoe’s poignant and highly believable portrayal of the artist. More impressionistic than factual, the film
successfully inhabits the mind and milieu of the painter in the last two years
of his life. It has a star-studded
supporting cast, led by Oscar Isaac as Gauguin.
There are off-putting elements in Schnabel’s film, but overall it
succeeds in his aim to show “what it is to be an artist.” If I were still programming films at the
A new film I’d been looking
for just turned up unexpectedly on Showtime, Kelly Reichardt’s First Cow (MC-89). With films like Wendy and Lucy, Meek’s
Cutoff, and Certain Women, she has certainly established herself as
one the most distinctive American independent filmmakers working today. There’s no mistaking a Reichardt film, even
when she doesn’t resort to the old-fashioned 4:3 aspect ratio, and First Cow
may be the most Kelly yet, as she achieves what I can only call an
overflowing minimalism – slow-paced, enigmatic, folktale-like yet palpably
real. Her penetration of the mythic West
called to mind one of my all-time favorites McCabe & Mrs. Miller, in
this depiction of 1820s
The primary referent for Daisy Haggard’s Back to Life (MC-87) is Fleabag, but there are also elements of Rectify (again) and a Masterpiece Mystery like Flesh and Blood, plus a parody of various true crime serials, which means it has many points of interest but is perhaps too diffuse in focus for its six half-hour episodes, and not a promising set-up for future seasons. Haggard effectively plays a woman who has spent half her life in prison after a teenage incident, returning to her seaside town to live with her nervous and quirky parents and to absorb the fear and antagonism of the community. If you have a taste for contemporary British comedy, this is definitely worth a look, but not something to go out of your way for.
Which brings us to The
Good Lord Bird (MC-84), which I did go out of my way for, because it
traffics in the period of history with which I have been obsessed for decades,
Saturday, November 14, 2020
Docs advice
If Frederick Wiseman were not still around at the age of 90, having just brought out another acclaimed film (City Hall, specifically
Heidi Schreck’s What the Constitution Means to Me (MC-87, AMZ) is not exactly a one-woman show or a documentary, but a Tony- and Pulitzer- nominated play that has been filmed by the suddenly ubiquitous Marielle Heller. Whom I’m reminded of most, and this constitutes high praise, is Hannah Gadsby, as Schreck combines personal experience and energetic humor into an honest and trenchant lecture on political and social concerns. As a 15-year-old Schreck had earned scholarship money by going around to American Legion halls and competing for speeches on the title topic. Decades later, she jumps off from her teenage words into personal and constitutional history, and the interweavings thereof. Discussing the 9th and 14th amendments in detail, she covers issues like citizenship and immigration, women’s rights and domestic abuse. Near the end, she brings in other voices, a gay man and two teenage black girls, to debate whether the constitution should be retained and amended, or rewritten from scratch, a proposition on which the audience then votes. The whole thing is educational, funny, and even moving.
Strictly for a special taste and history, which I confess to sharing, What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael (MC-68, AMZ) was a rare delicacy, like that Japanese fish that can kill you if you’re not careful. A movie about a film critic, who’d-a thunk it? But in her 24-year tenure in that role at The New Yorker, Kael was a cultural force to be reckoned with. For me personally, most often adversarily. I tended to stand with the Stanley Kauffmanns and John Simons of this small world. Even Andrew Sarris made more sense. But Pauline Kael was provocative, a sharp blade to parry with. Living in NYC in the mid-70s, I’d rush home from a new movie, to pick up her review and argue with it into the night, pricked by her misguided but well-articulated views. So Rob Garver’s documentary was for me a warm bath of cinephiliac nostalgia, with maybe a shard of broken wineglass in the tub. I enjoyed seeing all the talking heads, familiar faces and those I could finally put to a byline, but especially I liked the constant stream of very short clips from films, which illustrated or commented upon the intervening dialogue, while providing a pop-quiz mini-history of cinema during Kael’s reign. (It put me in mind of Christian Marclay’s The Clock, a 24-hour compilation of film clips, in each of which a clock appears exactly matching the viewer’s time; as a museum installation, you’re free to wander in and out, take a soft seat, and watch time pass by, while also taking a trip down cinematic memory lane.)
Anyway, one of my pandemic lockdown projects was to go through my shelves of film books, and among those I set aside for future donation to the local library’s second-hand bookstore, was a shelf of critics’ compilations – Kael, Kauffmann, Simon, and all but a select few volumes. I did keep two Library of America anthologies, American Movie Critics edited by Philip Lopate (he’s in the doc), and a Kael selection called The Age of Movies. Too bad these old reviews are not searchable online, but it’s unfeasibly cumbersome to find the relevant volume, then look in the index, then flip to the review, after one has been spoiled by finding any wanted text with a few clicks. And frankly, by now I’m mostly interested in formulating and expressing my own opinion about films rather than arguing with someone else’s. I still enjoy the simulated conversation of checking Metacritic or MRQE reviews, but usually after I’ve written my own, having checked facts and credits on Wikipedia.
Lately I’ve developed a non-culinary fascination with mushrooms, finding and photographing striking examples. I’m currently reading a highly entertaining and informative book called Entangled Life: How Fungi Make Our World, Change Our Minds & Shape Our Futures, so I was anxious enough to see Fantastic Fungi (MC-70, Vudu) to actually pay-per-view (only $5, or $1.67 each for three viewers), even though it will probably soon join the rest of Louie Schwartzberg’s “Moving Art” series on Netflix. I loved the time-lapse sequences of growing mushrooms, and much of the animation was illuminating (though as frequently the case with nature documentaries, I wish they labeled the film speed or means of illustration). But after the halfway point, the film takes a bit of a turn from the scientific (and pictorial) to woo-woo speculations about the anthropology of magic mushrooms and the resumption of psychedelic research as the war on drugs wanes. Some nice kaleidoscopic mandala sequences to go with the white coats from Johns Hopkins. But it’s hard not to come away with some belief in mushrooms as the salvation of earth and its humans, or at least partners in their survival.
Saturday, October 10, 2020
Lately released
So a useful companion piece is The Social Dilemma (MC-78,
All In: The Fight for Democracy (MC-78, AMZ) involves two women whom I definitely admire: political activist Stacey Abrams and filmmaker Liz Garbus. So I was happy and inspired to watch it, but can’t claim to have learned much from this solid civics lesson, though I do recommend it to anyone who is not well-versed in the history and tactics of voter suppression. (I favored Stacey over Kamala for VP, as a forceful and committed speaker if nothing else, but I have to shamefacedly admit she’ll need to do an Oprah and lose some weight before she’ll be a viable national candidate.)
It’s hard to believe that
Alex Gibney is an individual and not a consortium of documentary filmmakers,
because he’s just out with another: Totally Under Control (MC-80,
Hulu). This timely film, released in a
rush before the election, covers the federal government’s role in the
coronavirus disaster, focusing not so much on Mafia Don’s personal idiocies,
but instead, with a deafening chorus of whistleblowers, on the administration’s
ideological and political calculations, which crippled the government’s
response. If you start with the premise
that “government is the problem, not the solution,” you clear the field for the
grifters and grafters to profit while the public suffers. Make money for your friends and allies,
instead of taking the steps necessary for public health in a pandemic. This film lays the whole thing out step by
sickening step. If you can bear to
relive it, this will give you a new and fuller perspective.
From documentary to
docudrama, in the realm of the just-released, I have to enter a strong
recommendation for The Trial of the
One more well-received – and
artful – new documentary to cite: Dick
Johnson is Dead (MC-89, NFX). I
found Kirsten Johnson’s highly-praised directorial debut Cameraperson to
be unwatchable, and this follow-up to be indescribable, but definitely
watchable in its uniqueness. It’s a
portrait of her psychiatrist father, who is gradually succumbing to the
dementia that has already taken her mother.
She moves him from their old home in
In passing, let me offer a firm shrug of the shoulders to Flesh and Blood (MC-75, PBS). I’m far from a regular viewer of Masterpiece Mystery, but the presence of Imelda Staunton led me to give this a try. And indeed she is the best, if not the only, reason to watch this derivative ensemble piece. As is typical of British tv, the ensemble’s acting is quite good, led by Francesca Annis (best remembered as Lady Macbeth in Polanski’s Macbeth) and Stephen Rea (think back to The Crying Game) as two widowers getting together much to the anxiety of her children, and the sweet but intrusive neighbor (Imelda). This four-part series follows the Big Little Lies template of starting with an apparent murder without revealing the victim, and also in its reliance on coastal scenery and luxurious surroundings. In this case, the White Cliffs of Dover and adjoining beaches are featured prominently. So it’s not a hardship to watch by any means, but hardly expands one’s horizons. (A side note: these days I’m rarely able to make a distinction between programs shot on film vs. hi-def video, but with this one I was constantly aware of the latter’s visual deficiencies.)
On the other hand, let me offer a big thumbs up for The Queen’s Gambit (MC-78, NFX). At times, whoever at Metacritic is assigning rating numbers to reviews seems rather prejudicial. The reviews for this Netflix limited series are mostly raves, and so is mine. So many good things about it, with my only quibble that the seven episodes might better have been cut to the canonical six (there’s a reason why a sonnet has 14 lines), or expanded indefinitely. Written and directed by Scott Frank, from a novel by Walter Tevis (The Hustler, The Man Who Fell to Earth, The Color of Money), with vast sweep to go with psychological insight, the series revolves entirely around the transcendent performance of Anya Taylor-Joy as Beth Harmon, the chess prodigy who goes from Kentucky orphanage to World Championship match in Moscow. With production values to rival The Crown, the story spans the Sixties, with the focus on the chessboard, though tournaments in Mexico City, Las Vegas, Paris, and the Soviet Union are convincingly rendered, and Beth certainly registers the changes in style through the decade (cf. Mad Men). Outstanding acting all round, but special mention has to go to Marielle Heller – the estimable director of A Beautiful Day... (see above) – as Beth’s adoptive mother who goes from mad housewife to confidante of her gifted daughter, and to Bill Camp as the reclusive orphanage janitor from whom she learns the game. The boys and men that Beth humbles on her climb up the ladder of chess mastery are also well portrayed. I’m no more a chess player than I was a billiards player, but the variety of ways and places that the game is cinematically depicted keeps the viewer leaning in and hanging on the action. But it all comes down to the stunning looks and bewitching gaze of Anya Taylor-Joy, as she navigates the perils and promise of her chosen obsessions.
Emma. (MC-71, HBO) is likewise graced by Anya T-J and likewise undervalued by Metacritic. I feel quite proprietary about Jane Austen, and quite severe about some pop culture appropriations of her novels. Anya can’t supplant Kate Beckinsale as my favorite Emma, but rockets ahead of Gwyneth Paltrow and Romola Garai. In Autumn de Wilde’s directorial debut, she starts out in Wes Anderson or Marie Antoinette territory, with an arch, pastel-toned, anachronistic approach, but soon settles into quite faithful adaptation, with good performances all round, hitting all the high points of the story. Bill Nighy is amusing as Mr. Woodhouse, and Johnny Flynn makes a believable Knightley, and other familiar faces from British TV admirably fill out the subsidiary roles. The settings and costume design are delightful, as expected, justifying the punctuation that announces the film as a period piece. All round, quite satisfying to Janeites and newbies alike.
The next section of this
composite review is a follow-up to my “Black films matter” post. First off, The 40-Year Old Version (MC-80,
NFX). Radha Blank wrote and directed, as
well as starring in, this highly but not totally autobiographical – self-aware
and serio-comic – take on the Black artist’s life. Besides the nod in the title, this black
& white (in several senses) film takes after She’s Gotta Have It and
Time (MC-94, AMZ) is a powerful collaboration between two strong Black women, director Garrett Bradley (award winner at Sundance this year) and subject Sibil Fox Richardson, who goes by Fox Rich as a New Orleans businesswoman, motivational speaker, mother of six boys, and tireless advocate for her husband Rob, incarcerated at Angola on a no-reprieve 60-year sentence. They were both arrested for a desperate and hapless armed robbery attempt; she took a plea bargain for 12 years and was out in 3½, he went to trial and was subjected to punitive retribution. So Fox has to raise her boys without a father and hold her tight-knit family together through two decades. One thing she does is take a wealth of home movies, which make up a good portion of the film. Bradley is the daughter of two painters, and takes an artistic, associative approach to the material, mixing her own footage and Fox’s into a fluid amalgam, a meditation on the many meanings of doing time. This film makes a highly-personalized companion to Ava DuVernay’s more comprehensive documentary 13th, advancing the case for mass incarceration as the new slavery.
Driving While Black: Race, Space, and Mobility in America (MC-92, PBS) offers abundant history and context to the many dimensions of DWB, from the days when slaves weren’t allowed to leave the plantation, to the rise of Jim Crow and the KKK terrorizing Blacks who wandered into White space, to the segregation of transport, to the development of the automobile and The Green Book, through the decimation of black neighborhoods by interstate highways, all the way to the horrifying results of way too many white-on-black traffic stops these days. This comprehensive and well-put-together informational documentary by Gretchen Sorin and Ric Burns makes a valuable contribution to the current vital public conversations on the legacies of racism.